Office of Inspector General/Office of Audit
[TEXT ONLY] Search


Audit Process
Audit Reports
Freedom of Information Act
Semiannual Report
Single Audit
Staff Listings
OIG Hotline




Return to Office of Audit Home Page

ALLEGATION AT THE GREATER OMAHA WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT


This document is a summary of a printed document. The printed document may contain charts and photographs which are not reproduced in this electronic version. If you require the printed version of this document, contact the Freedom of Information Act Officer, Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210, or call (202) 693-5116.

This report reflects the findings of the Office of Inspector General at the time that the audit report was issued. More current information may be available as a result of the resolution of this audit by the Department of Labor program agency and the auditee. For further information concerning the resolution of this report's findings, please contact the program agency.

OIG has started using Acrobat 4.0 to prepare it's latest Audit reports. If you are experiencing problems downloading some of the larger PDF files, you may want to download the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking the link provided below.

Get Acrobat Reader 4.0



At the request of ETA, the OIG investigated several allegations made regarding the expenditure of Welfare-to-Work grant funds by at the Greater Omaha Workforce Development (GOWD). The most serious allegation concerned mismanagement and favoritism in awarding contracts to conduct program activities. .

We found that contracts for teaching certain courses were not competitively bid. GOWD and City of Omaha officials believed that competitive bidding was not required for these contracts because they were professional services contracts which are exempt from competition per the Home Rule Charter of the City of Omaha. The OIG concluded the definition of "professional services" contained in the Omaha Municipal Code did not support this position, and the contracts in question were subject to competitive bidding. The OIG did not find merit in the other allegations. GOWD concurred with our recommendation that, in the future, it follow its local procurement requirements which require full and open competition.

(OA Report No. 05-01-001-03-386, issued March 7, 2001)

Get Complete Report Get Complete Report



Privacy and Security Statement

-- DISCLAIMER

Send technical comments to: Webmaster@oig.dol.gov
Comments relating to policy, content or style should be directed to:
rpts-coordinator@oig.dol.gov .

divider line

Return to DOL Home Page DOL Home Page Return to OIG Home Page OIG Home Page Return to top of document Top of Document